Thursday, July 19, 2007
Evaluserve report predicts Indian KPO Boom
"The Evalueserve report also states in detail about the few sub-sectors within the KPO industry that are expected to do well. These include banking, finance, securities and insurance research, data mining and analytics and contract research organizations and biotech services."
Thats some good news ;). Having decided to make a career in this field, and still watching it find its firm feet, I think these occasional headlines are very importants for us to feel confident about the career choice we have made.
Tuesday, July 3, 2007
Nascence, Idling & Adolescence
One of the things I’ve always been scared about, in an organization, is the transition from Nascence to Adolescence. What I mean is a new/small/fresh/startup environment of the firm (NASCENCE), gradually maturing into the processes/culture/large company environment (ADOLESCENCE). However, the theme here is the transition process and my fear around Idling. Often, as we build delivery capacity, the lag between sales and delivery often leads to idle (delivery) time for the team.
Let me show a cycle of events, which I hope some of you will identify with –
- Company gets a project in a new space (analytics here)
- Company hires people to get it done
- Company views this as an opportunity to build its presence in the space
- Company starts building the business case. A core team is put together to convert the project into a vertical/business
- The wheels start rolling. Sales team is roped in for selling. Delivery capacity starts getting built. Everyone is busy. Everyone is enjoying the dirt on the track.
- New guys come in. Some start working on new projects. Some wait for projects.
- The unutilized team members are put on firm-development and intellectual capital development
- On the ground, there is an uncomfortable buzz. The seriousness required to complete these internal initiatives is often missing. The unrest begins!
My guess is that the blame should be taken by the initial overworked guys like me, who end up believing that they are the ones doing the “real” work, all FD and IC is just a way of keeping guys busy.
The second group to take blame should be the leadership which is in charge of looking at the FD and IC initiatives. Its their responsibility to inculcate the sense of pride, responsibility and importance associated with these inward oriented projects.The third group to be blamed, to the least extent, is the new group itself. A simple saying like
That said, I believe that it is how well we handle this stage of growth, that differentiates a great leadership from an average leadership. and yes, one of the ways of doing it is communication (clear, effective and copious)
What do you think?